Why do geologists say that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old? For
many hundreds of years, most people in European, Western, and
other cultures believed the Earth to be about 6,000 years old, based
on interpretations of passages in the Torah and Old Testament. However,
based on the principles of uniformitarianism outlined by James
Hutton and Charles Lyell, geologists in the late 1700s and 1800s
began to understand the immensity of time required to form the geologic
units and structures on the planet and argued for a much
greater antiquity of the planet. When Charles Darwin advanced his
ideas about evolution of species, he added his voice to those calling
for tens to hundreds of millions of years required to explain the natural
history of the planet and its biota. In 1846 the physicist Lord
Kelvin joined the argument, but he advocated an even more ancient
Earth. He noted that the temperature increased with depth, and he
assumed that this heat was acquired during the initial accretion and
formation of the planet, and has been escaping slowly ever since.
Using heat flow equations Kelvin calculated that the Earth must be
20–30 million years old. However, Kelvin assumed that there were no
new inputs of heat to the planet since it formed, and he did not know
about radioactivity and heat produced by radioactive decay. In 1896
Madame Curie, working in the labs of Henri Becquerel in France,
exposed film to uranium in a light-tight container and found that the
film became exposed by a kind of radiation that was invisible to the
eye. Soon, many elements were found to have isotopes, or nuclei of
the same element with different amounts of neutron in the nucleus.
Some isotopes are unstable and decay from one state to another,
releasing radioactivity. Radioactive decay occurs at a very specific
and fixed average rate that is characteristic of any given isotope. In
1903 Pierre Curie and Albert Laborde recognized that radioactive
decay releases heat, a discovery that was immediately used by
geologists to reconcile geologic evidence of uniformitarianism with
Lord Kelvin’s calculated age of the Earth.
In 1905 Ernest Rutherford suggested that the constant rate of
decay of radioactive isotopes could be used to date minerals and
rocks. Because radioactivity happens at a statistically regular rate
for each isotope, it can be used to date rocks. For each isotope an
average rate of decay is defined by the time that it takes half of the
sample to decay from its parent to daughter product, a time known
as the half-life of the isotope. Thus, to date a rock we need to know
the ratio of the parent to daughter isotopes and simply multiply by
the decay rate of the parent. Half-life is best thought of as the time
it takes for half of any size sample to decay, since radioactive
decay is a nonlinear exponential process.
The rate of decay of each isotope determines which isotopic
systems can be used to date rocks of certain ages. Also, the isotopes
must occur naturally in the type of rock being assessed and
the daughter products must be present only from decay of the parent
isotope. Some of the most accurate geochronologic clocks are
made by comparing the ratios of daughter products from two different
decay schemes—since both daughters are only present as a
result of decay from their parents, and their ratios provide special
highly sensitive clocks.
Isotopes and their decay products provide the most powerful
way to determine the age of the Earth. Most elements formed during
thermonuclear reactions in pre-solar system stars that experienced
supernovae explosions. The main constraints we have on
the age of the Earth are that it must be younger than 6–7 billion
years, because it still contains elements such as K-40, with a halflife
of 1.25 billion years. If the Earth were any older, all of the parent
product would have decayed. Isotopic ages represent the time that
that particular element-isotope system got incorporated in a mineral
structure. Since isotopes have been decaying since they were
incorporated, the oldest age from an Earth rock gives a minimum
age of the Earth. So far, the oldest known rock is the 4.03-billionyear-
old Acasta gneiss of the Slave Province in northwest Canada,
and the oldest mineral is a 4.2-billion-year-old zircon from western
Australia. From these data, we can infer that the Earth is between
4.2 and 6 billion years old.
The crust on the Moon is 4.2–4.5 billion years old, and the
Earth, Moon, and meteorites all formed when the solar system
formed. The U-Pb isotopic system is one of the most useful for
determining the age of the Earth, although many other systems give
identical results. Some meteorites contain lead, but no U or Th parents.
Since the proportions of the various lead isotopes have
remained fixed since they formed, their relative proportions can be
used to measure the primordial lead ratios in the early Earth. Then,
by looking at the ratios of the four lead isotopes in rocks on Earth
from various ages, we can extrapolate back to when they had the
same primordial lead ratio. These types of estimates give an age of
4.6–4.7 billion years for the Earth, and 4.3–4.6 billion years for meteorites.
So, the best estimate for the age of the Earth is 4.6 billion
years, a teenager in the universe.
generally found together in mixtures and each one decays
into several daughter products (including radium) before
turning into lead. The 230Th/234U disequilibrium method is
one of the most commonly used uranium-series techniques.
This method is based on the fact that uranium is much more
soluble than thorium, so materials such as corals, mollusks,
calcic soils, bones, carbonates, cave deposits, and fault zones
are enriched in uranium with respect to thorium. This
method can be used to date features as old as Precambrian.
Uranium-lead dating also uses the known original abundance
of isotopes of uranium and the known decay rates of
parents to daughter isotopes. This technique is useful for dating
rocks up to billions of years old. All naturally occurring
uranium contains 238U and 235U in the ratio of 137.7:1. 238U
decays to 206Pb with a half-life of 4,510 Ma through a process
of eight alpha-decay steps and six beta-decay steps. 235U
decays to 207Pb (with a half-life of 713 Ma) by a similar series
of stages that involves seven alpha-decay steps and four betadecay
steps. Uranium-lead dating techniques were initially
applied to uranium minerals such as uraninite and pitchblende,
but these are rare, so very precise methods of measuring isotopic
ratios in other minerals with only trace amounts of uranium
and lead (zircon, sphene) were developed. The amount of
radiogenic lead in all these methods must be distinguished
from naturally occurring lead, and this is calculated using their
abundance with 204Pb, which is stable. After measuring the
ratios of each isotope relative to 204Pb, the ratios of 235U/207Pb
and 238U/206Pb should give the same age for the sample, and a
plot with each system plotted on one axis shows each age. If
the two ages agree, the ages will plot on a curve known as concordia,
which tracks the evolution of these ratios in the Earth
v. time. Ages that plot on concordia are said to be concordant.
However, in many cases the ages determined by the two ratios
are different and they plot off the concordia curve. This occurs
when the system has been heated or otherwise disturbed during
its history, causing a loss of some of the lead daughter isotopes.
Because 207Pb and 206Pb are chemically identical, they
are usually lost in the same proportions.
The thorium-lead dating technique is similar to the uranium-
lead technique and uses the decay from 232Th to 208Pb
(with 6He4), with a half-life of 13,900 years. Minerals used
for this method include sphene, zircon, monazite, apatite, and
other rare U-Th minerals. The ratio of 208Pb/232Th is comparable
with 207Pb/235U. This method is not totally reliable and
is usually employed in conjunction with other methods. In
most cases, the results are discordant, showing a loss of lead
from the system. The Th-Pb method can also be interpreted
by means of isochron diagrams.
Potassium-argon dating is based on the decay of radioactive
potassium into calcium and argon gas at a specific rate
and is accomplished by measuring the relative abundances of
40K and 40Ar in a sample. The technique is potentially useful
for dating samples as old as four billion years. Potassium is
one of the most abundant elements in the Earth’s crust (2.4
percent by mass). One out of every 100 potassium atoms is
radioactive 40K, with 19 protons and 21 neutrons. If one of
the protons is hit by a beta particle, it can be converted into a
neutron. With 18 protons and 22 neutrons, the atom becomes
40Ar, an inert gas. For every 100 40K atoms that decay, 11
become 40Ar.
By comparing the proportion of 40K to 40Ar in a sample,
and knowing the decay rate of 40K, the age of the sample can
be estimated. The technique works well in some cases, but it
is unreliable in samples that have been heated or recrystallized
after formation. Since it is a gas, 40Ar can easily migrate
in and out of potassium-bearing rocks, changing the ratio
between parent and daughter.
Fission track dating is used to determine the thermal age
of a sample, the time lapsed since the last significant heating
event (typically above 215°F, or 102°C). Fission tracks are
paths of radiation damage made by nuclear particles released
by spontaneous fission or radioactive decay of 238U. Fission
tracks are created at a constant rate in uranium bearing minerals,
so by determining the density of tracks present it is possible
to determine the amount of time that has passed since
the tracks began to form in the mineral. Fission track dating
is used for determining the thermal ages of samples between
about 100,000 and 1,000,000 years old, and it is also used
for estimating the uplift and erosional history of areas, by
recording when specific points cooled past 102°C.
Thermoluminescence is a chronometric dating method
based on the fact that some minerals, when heated, give off a
flash of light. The intensity of the light is proportional to the
amount of radiation the sample has been exposed to and the
length of time since the sample was heated. Luminesence is
caused by heating a substance and thus liberating electrons
trapped in its crystal defects. The phenomenon is used as a
dating technique, especially for pottery. The number of
trapped electrons is assumed to be related to the quantity of
ionizing radiation to which the specimen has been exposed
since firing, because the crystal defects are caused by ionizing
radiation, and therefore related to the sample’s age. Thus, by
measuring the amount of light emitted on heating, an estimate
of the age of the sample is obtained.
There are a number of other isotopic systems that are
used for geochronology but they are less commonly used or
less reliable than the methods described above. Geochronologists
also incorporate relative and correlation dating techniques,
such as stratigraphic correlation of dated units, to
explore the wider implications of ages of dated units. A paleomagnetic
timescale has been constructed for the past 180
million years, and in many situations it is now possible to
determine the age of a particular part of a stratigraphic column
or location on the seafloor by knowing which geomagnetic
period the position is located within. Finally, geochronologists
use structural cross-cutting relationships to determine which
parts of a succession are older than or younger than a dated
sample. Eventually the geochronologist is able to put together
a temporal history of a rock terrane by dating several samples
and combining these ages with cross-cutting observations and
correlation with other units.
See also CARBON-14 DATING; DENDROCHRONOLOGY;
PALEOMAGNETISM; RADIOACTIVE DECAY; STRATIGRAPHY.














Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
Catatan: Hanya anggota dari blog ini yang dapat mengirim komentar.