The science of tectonics began with Niels
Stensens’s (alias Nicolaus Steno) publication in 1669 of strain
analyses and reconstructions of the pre-deformational configuration
of Tuscany, northern Italy. The 18th and early 19th
centuries were dominated by views that deformation and
uplift of mountain belts were caused by magmatic intrusions
and volcanic eruptions and/or the downhill sliding of rock
massifs, for example, James Hutton in 1795, Sir James Hall
in 1815, Baron Leopold von Buch in 1824, de Saussure in
1796, Gillet-Laumont in 1977, and Studer in 1851–53. In
1829 and 1852 Leonce Elie de Beaumont published an alternative
view in which the deformation and uplift of mountain
belts was attributed to thermal contraction of a cooling
Earth, and this view was popular until the mid-20th century.
Mountain belts were viewed as products of crustal shortening
by the Rogers brothers (1843) and by James Dwight Dana
(1866, 1873), but these scientists still attributed the shortening
to global thermal contraction and explosive volcanism (A.
M. Celal Sengör, 1982).
Classical theories of orogenesis were upheaved in 1875
with the publication of Eduard Suess’s Die Entstehung der
Alpen. Suess synthesized structural and stratigraphic relationships
in mountain belts of the world and emphasized the controlling
role of crustal shortening. Although still following
the scheme of global contraction, Suess noticed that the global
orientation of mountain belts did not obey any simple
geometry as expected from uniform global contraction but
seemed to reflect an interaction between older rigid massifs
and a progression of contractional events on the margins of
the massifs. All these models assumed local contraction and
did not consider any large-scale translations of rock massifs.
In 1884 Marcel Bertrand reinterpreted geological relations in
the Alpine Glaurus in terms of a “nappe,” which required
large horizontal movements, around 25 miles (40 km).
Although the nappe theory was not officially recognized until
1903 at the International Geological Congress in Vienna, the
publication of this paper marks the beginning of widespread
recognition of significant translations in rock massifs. In
Suess’s last volume of Das Antlitz der Erde (1909), he admitted
that the amount of shortening observed in mountain belts
was greater than could be explained by global cooling and
contraction, and he suggested that perhaps other translations
have occurred in response to tidal forces and the rotation of
the planet. Suess argued on geological grounds for a former
unity between Africa and India.
The idea of stable plate interiors can be traced back to
Leopold Kober’s Der Bau der Erde (1921), in which he
defined kratogens as areas of low or no mobility, and orogens
as areas of high mobility. About this same time (1908, 1916),
Emily Argand, clearly of the mobilist school, had documented
a continuous Mesozoic through Cenozoic kinematic evolution
of the Alpine Orogen. In 1915 and 1929 Alfred Wegener published
Die Entstehung der Kontinente and Die Entstehung der
Kontinente und Ozeane. Wegener argued strongly for large
horizontal motions between cratons made of sial, and using
such data as the match of restored coastlines and paleontological
data, he founded the theory of continental drift. The most
notable of these early mobilists were Alex du Toit, Reginald
A. Daly, Arthur Holmes, Solomon Calvi, and Ishan Ketin (A.
M. Celal Sengör, 1982). Alfred Wegener (1915) and Alex du
Toit (1927) matched positions of Precambrian cratons and
younger fold belts and sedimentary basins between Africa and
South America to support continental drift, and it was not
until much later, in the 1960s, that continental drift theory
developed into a true, multidisciplinary science. It was the
geophysical exploration of the seafloor and documentation of
rock paleomagnetism that provided the strongest evidence for
seafloor spreading and continental drift and led to the theory
of plate tectonics (J. Tuzo Wilson, 1965).
Relative plate motions are now corroborated by a plethora
of different types of data, including but not limited to the
qualitative assertions of the early pioneers. Geological similarities
between continents with similar strata and structures
continue to offer some of the strongest evidence supporting
continental drift. Precise computer-aided geological correlations
continue to this day to be one of the most powerful tools
for reconstructing past configurations of the continents.
Paleontological and biological data have supported the
continental drift hypothesis, with copious early arguments by
Arldt (1917), Jaworski (1921), and Alfred Wegener (1929).
Since then, paleontological research in tectonics has established
paleobiogeographic provinces and has led to the establishment
of biostratigraphic timescales (e.g., Truswell, 1981),
used for dating geological events. Paleontological data have
been directly used to infer plate movements in a few cases.
Nordeng (1959, 1963) and Vologdin (1961, 1963) described
heliotropic growth of stromatolite columns toward the equator
and noted that the apparently changing directions of the
equator through time could be interpreted in terms of a wandering
pole (or shifting continents). William McKerrow and
Cocks (1976) used paleobiogeography to infer the rate of closure
of the Iapetus Ocean; Runnegar (1977) used the districontinental
drift and plate tectonics: historical development of theories 91
bution of cold water circumpolar faunas to infer the drift of
Gondwana over the poles. Dwight Bradley and Timothy
Kusky (1986) used graptolite biostratigraphy to infer convergence
rates and directions for the Taconic orogeny.
Tectonic syntheses based on paleoclimatology have
exploited relationships between certain types of deposits,
which are most likely to form between specific latitudes. For
instance, tillites associated with glaciation tend to form in
high latitudes, whereas evaporites and carbonate reefs have a
preference for growing within 30°N/S of the equator (e.g.,
Briden and Irving, 1964). Thus, evaporites, tillites, red beds,
coal deposits, and phosphorites all give some indication of
paleolatitude and can be used with other data for plate reconstructions
(e.g., Frakes, 1981; Ziegler, 1981).
The transition zone between thick
buoyant continental crust and the thin dense submerged
oceanic crust. There are several different types, depending on
the tectonic setting. Passive, trailing, or Atlantic-type margins
form where an extensional boundary evolves into an
ocean basin, and new oceanic crust is added to the center of
the basin between originally facing continental margins.
These margins were heated and thermally elevated during
rifting and gradually cool and thermally subside for several
tens of millions of years, slowly accumulating thick
sequences of relatively flat sediments, forming continental
shelves. These shelves are succeeded seaward by continental
slopes and rises. The ocean/continent boundary is typically
drawn at the shelf/slope break on these Atlantic-type margins,
where water depths average a couple of hundred
meters. Passive margins do not mark plate boundaries but
rim most parts of many oceans, including the Atlantic and
Indian, and form around most of Antarctica and Australia.
Young immature passive margins are beginning to form
along the Red Sea.
Convergent, leading, or Pacific-type margins form at
convergent plate boundaries. They are characterized by active
deformation, seismicity, and volcanism, and some have thick
belts of rocks known as accretionary prisms that are scraped
off of a subducting plate and added to the overriding continental
plate. Convergent margins may have a deep-sea trench
up to seven miles (11 km) deep marking the boundary
between the continental and oceanic plates. These trenches
form where the oceanic plate is bending and plunging deep
into the mantle. Abundant folds and faults in the rocks characterize
convergent margins. Other convergent margins are
characterized by old eroded bedrock near the margin,
exposed by a process of sediment erosion where the edge of
the continent is eroded and drawn down into the trench.
A third type of continental margin forms along transform
or transcurrent plate boundaries. These are characterized
by abundant seismicity and deformation, and volcanism
is limited to certain restricted areas. Deformation along transform
margins tends to be divided into different types depending
on the orientation of bends in the main plate boundary
fault. Constraining bends form where the shape of the
boundary restricts motion on the fault and are characterized
by strong folding, faulting, and uplift. The Transverse Ranges
of southern California form a good example of a restraining
bend. Sedimentary basins and subsidence characterize bends
in the opposite direction, where the shape of the fault causes
extension in areas where parts of the fault diverge during
movement. Volcanic rocks form in some of these basins. The
Gulf of California and Salton trough have formed in areas of
extension along a transform margin in southern California.
See also CONVERGENT PLATE MARGIN PROCESSES; DIVERGENT
OR EXTENSIONAL BOUNDARIES; PLATE TECTONICS;
TRANSFORM PLATE MARGIN PROCESSES.
continental shield See SHIELD.














Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
Catatan: Hanya anggota dari blog ini yang dapat mengirim komentar.