Intrusive bodies of relatively buoyant rocks that
produce an upwarp, a fold, or penetrate through surrounding
denser rocks. They may be made of sedimentary, igneous, or
even metamorphic rocks.
In sedimentary sequences, diapirs are typically made of
salt or shale that became mobilized and buoyant when buried
under thick piles of younger strata. Most salts and shales of
this category were initially formed as sedimentary layers but
intruded upward to form diapirs when the weight of overlying
rocks became sufficient to mobilize the salt and shale deposits.
The salts typically become buoyant relative to the surrounding
rocks when they reach a burial depth of about 1,450–3,250
feet (450–1,000 m), but it takes some triggering mechanism
(such as shaking on a fault) to initiate the movement of the
salt, referred to as diapirism. In a few places, such as the
Great Kavir in the Zagros Mountains of Iran, salt diapirs have
emerged at the surface and have formed great salt glaciers.
Salt diapirs move by ductile flow forming complex and
strongly attenuated folds. Externally, most salt diapirs form
mushroom shapes with thin necks and expanded heads. These
are referred to as salt domes. Some salt diapirs have moved
very far, even tens of kilometers from their area of deposition,
forming large sheets that are said to be allochthonous (far
traveled). Many other shapes of salt and shale diapirs are
known. Salt and shale diapirs typically form folds and make
permeability barriers that form economically significant
petroleum traps, so a great deal of seismic exploration for
hydrocarbons has been done around salt domes and diapirs.
Diapirs may also be composed of igneous rocks that
intrude surrounding country rocks. Igneous diapirs may be
isolated bodies or internal parts of plutons. Some form
shapes similar to salt and shale diapirs, but internal structures
are more difficult to recognize because they do not have as
many marker horizons as sedimentary salts and shales. Some
metamorphic gneiss domes may also rise diapirically,
although this is disputed because similar patterns can be
formed by fold interference patterns in gneiss terrains.
See also CONTINENTAL CRUST; PLUTON; STRUCTURAL
GEOLOGY; ZAGROS AND MAKRAN MOUNTAINS.














Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar
Catatan: Hanya anggota dari blog ini yang dapat mengirim komentar.